Hollywood Stars Who Slammed Trump Now Asking For Help With AI Protections...

Major virus outbreak prompts UK health board to stop all hospital visits immediately...

Musk group offers $100 to Wisconsin voters ahead of pivotal state Supreme Court election...

What to Know About the Nonprofit 'PhD Project' Amid Anti-DEI Crackdown...

Taxpayer-Funded Immigration Group Chaired by DOJ Employee Wants To Abolish ICE, Defund Police...

Rogue Judges Are Turning Judicial Review Into Judicial Rule

President Donald Trump made headlines this week by continuing deportation flights of illegal immigrants, including members of the violent Tren de Aragua gang, despite a federal judge’s ruling that attempted to halt the practice.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee, issued an order barring the administration from carrying out deportations to El Salvador. The White House called the decision “lawless” and said the order was moot because the flights had already left and crossed into international waters. It has stopped further such flights for now.

Trump’s defiance is already being framed as an attack on the rule of law. But the real assault is coming from the courts themselves. For too long, judges have operated under the assumption that their authority is limitless, that elected officials must bow to their rulings no matter how far they stray from the Constitution. Boasberg’s ruling is not judicial review, but judicial rule — a clear case of a court attempting to override a core executive power in the name of politics.

For decades, American society has placed an almost sacred trust in the judiciary, elevating it above the elected branches of government. That deference has emboldened judges to expand their power, transforming the courts from interpreters of law into de facto rulers in black robes. The