Colleges like Penn face ire as they try to comply with Trump administration DEI demands...

Elon Musk Threatens Pentagon Leakers After China War Story...

Heathrow Airport fire 'contained version of 9/11' as it's compared to terror attack...

Trump Asks Students: 'Should I Do This?'...

Boeing ‘threatened to break’ whistleblower who died by suicide: Lawsuit...

Enough is enough, SCOTUS — slap down these delusional judges and let Trump get to work

Who should have more power: the president of the United States, or a federal district judge — one of nearly 700 — in a courthouse anywhere in the nation?

The answer is obvious, and pure common sense.

The president is elected by millions, empowered by the US Constitution to ensure “the laws be faithfully executed,” conduct foreign policy and command the nation’s armed forces.

Most district court judges get there because they know somebody who knows somebody in the president’s party.

Their role on the bench is generally limited to deciding the case before them based on existing law.

Yet across the country, highly partisan district judges are using legal ploys to bulldoze Trump, stymie his agenda — and set national, even international, policy.

In dozens of cases since Jan. 20, federal district judges — the lowest on the ladder — have issued nationwide injunctions halting Trump’s suspension of foreign aid, his deportation of Tren de Aragua and MS-13 gang members, his layoffs and spending cuts in federal departments and agencies, his prohibitions on discriminatory diversity programs in higher education and government hiring, and more.

On Tuesday, US District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, DC, issued a nationwide injunction barring the Pentagon from enforcing Trump’s Jan. 27 executive order excluding transgender individuals from the military.